Teardown

Retail · Deep dive

Macy's, Inc.

The 168-year-old department store trying to shrink its way to relevance — a $21.8B, three-banner retailer whose real estate may be worth more than its $6B market cap, now four activist campaigns deep, one year past a rejected $6.9B take-private bid and a $151M accounting scandal, and finally printing its best comps in four years under Bloomingdale's-lifer CEO Tony Spring.

at risk

Four quarters of positive comps and real Bloomingdale's momentum do not change the arithmetic of a retailer whose earnings lean on credit-card income and asset-sale gains, whose market cap sits below its own claimed real-estate value, and whose core format has lost 44% of its retail value since 2010.

HQ
New York, New York
Founded
1858 (R.H. Macy dry goods, Manhattan); Federated Department Stores 1929; renamed Macy's, Inc. 2007
Ownership
Public (NYSE: M); institution-dominated float; Barington Capital and Thor Equities running an activist campaign since December 2024
Funding
Federated Department Stores public since the mid-20th century; emerged from Chapter 11 in 1992 (Federated) and acquired bankrupt R.H. Macy & Co. in 1994; no controlling shareholder
Valuation
Market capitalization roughly $6.15B as of July 24, 2026, with the stock near $25 — up about 77% in a year (stockanalysis.com, companiesmarketcap.com, July 2026); activists value the real estate alone at $5-9B (Barington/Thor, December 2024); Arkhouse and Brigade's final rejected take-private offer was $24.80/share, roughly $6.9B (July 2024)
Revenue
$21.8B fiscal 2025 net sales (year ended January 31, 2026), comparable sales +1.5% — the first positive annual comp since fiscal 2021; Q1 fiscal 2026 (reported June 3, 2026) comps +3.0%, the best first quarter in four years; FY2026 guidance raised to $21.5-21.75B net sales (company releases, March and June 2026)
Headcount
Roughly 94,000 (fiscal 2025, Macrotrends/company filings) — down from over 130,000 pre-pandemic as the store fleet shrinks
Screen
Public incumbent — $21.8B fiscal 2025 net sales, roughly $9-10B enterprise value including debt and leases, and an active activist campaign (company filings, March 2026)
Published
2026-07-28
Web
www.macysinc.com
Elsewhere
LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Founders and leadership

  • Rowland Hussey Macy Founder (R.H. Macy & Co., 1858)

    A Nantucket Quaker and former whaler who failed at four retail ventures before opening a dry-goods store on Sixth Avenue and 14th Street in Manhattan in 1858. His innovations — one-price policy, money-back guarantees, heavy newspaper advertising, the red star logo from his whaling tattoo — built the store that moved to Herald Square in 1902 and became 'the world's largest store.' The company he founded went bankrupt in 1992 and was absorbed by Federated Department Stores in 1994; Federated took the Macy's name company-wide in 2007.

  • Jeff Gennette Chairman and CEO 2017-February 2024

    A 40-year Macy's lifer who started as an executive trainee in 1983 and ran the company through its hardest stretch: the 2020 pandemic (sales fell by a third), the Polaris restructuring, 125 announced store closures, and two activist attacks. He rejected Arkhouse's opening bid in his final weeks and handed Tony Spring a company with declining sales but a repaired balance sheet.

  • Tony Spring Chairman and CEO (since February 2024)

    A Cornell graduate who joined Bloomingdale's in 1987 as an executive merchandise trainee in the White Plains store and never left the company — 36 years up through home furnishings, marketing, and merchandising to Bloomingdale's CEO from 2014 to 2023, mentored for two decades by predecessor Mike Gould. Named Gennette's successor in September 2023 and CEO in February 2024, he is the first Macy's, Inc. chief to come from the luxury banner rather than the namesake chain — and his plan, Bold New Chapter, reads like it: shrink Macy's, grow Bloomingdale's and Bluemercury.

Snapshot

Macy’s, Inc. is America’s largest surviving traditional department store company — $21.8B of net sales in fiscal 2025 (year ended January 31, 2026) across roughly 650 stores under three banners: the namesake Macy’s, luxury Bloomingdale’s, and beauty chain Bluemercury — and the market’s favorite case study in managed decline versus hidden value. It matters now for three colliding reasons. First, the turnaround is finally printing numbers: fiscal 2025 delivered the first positive annual comp since 2021 (+1.5%), and the quarter reported June 3, 2026 posted +3.0% comps, the best first quarter in four years. Second, the vultures keep circling: an activist campaign by Barington Capital and Thor Equities, running since December 2024, claims the real estate alone is worth $5-9B against a market cap of about $6.15B (July 2026) — the fourth activist attack in a decade and the second act after a rejected $6.9B take-private bid. Third, the format itself is dying underneath the company: US department store value has fallen roughly 44% since 2010, and store counts have nearly halved since 2015.

Founding story

Rowland Hussey Macy was a Nantucket Quaker who went whaling as a teenager, came home with a red star tattooed on his hand, and failed at four stores before the fifth one worked: a dry-goods shop opened on Sixth Avenue in Manhattan in 1858, whose first day reportedly took in $11.06. His methods — fixed prices, money-back guarantees, saturation advertising, that red star as the logo — scaled into the Herald Square flagship of 1902, “the world’s largest store.” The modern company is really a creature of consolidation: Federated Department Stores (founded 1929) bought R.H. Macy & Co. out of bankruptcy in 1994, swallowed May Department Stores for about $11B in 2005 — converting regional icons like Marshall Field’s and Filene’s into Macy’s nameplates — and renamed itself Macy’s, Inc. in 2007, near the format’s peak.

The leadership story mirrors the strategy shift. Jeff Gennette, a 40-year lifer who started as an executive trainee in 1983, ran the company from 2017 through the pandemic and the Polaris restructuring. His successor, Tony Spring, is the first Macy’s, Inc. CEO drawn from Bloomingdale’s rather than the namesake: a Cornell grad who joined Bloomingdale’s in 1987 as a merchandise trainee in White Plains, spent 36 years climbing through home furnishings and merchandising under mentor Mike Gould, and ran Bloomingdale’s as CEO from 2014 to 2023. Named successor in September 2023 and CEO in February 2024 (CNBC), Spring announced Bold New Chapter three weeks into the job. The plan is his biography as strategy: shrink the struggling middle-market banner, grow the luxury and beauty ones he knows.

How it works

Mechanically, Macy’s is a mall-anchor machine being converted, store by store, into a smaller and more curated one. The Bold New Chapter fleet math: close about 150 underperforming Macy’s stores through 2026 (66 closed by late 2025; only 14 slated for 2026, a sign the heavy cutting is done — Forbes, January 2026), concentrate on roughly 350 “go-forward” locations, and prove out a high-touch model in a pilot subset — the “First 50” stores, expanded to “Reimagine 125,” now about 200 locations carrying roughly 60% of the go-forward Macy’s store base. The Reimagine treatment is unglamorous and physical: more staffed fitting rooms and shoe runners, dedicated visual merchandising, better lighting and fixtures, faster online-order pickup. It works, modestly — Reimagine locations comped +2.4% in the quarter ended May 2026 versus +1.6% for the nameplate overall. Alongside, Macy’s operates small-format off-mall stores (Market by Macy’s and Bloomie’s, roughly 30,000-50,000 square feet against a 180,000-square-foot anchor), which carry lower operating costs and higher customer-satisfaction scores. Digital — roughly a third of revenue — runs through macys.com, a third-party marketplace, and the Macy’s Media Network, the in-house retail-media arm selling ads across Macy’s and Bloomingdale’s properties. Two non-merchandise engines matter disproportionately: the Citibank-issued proprietary credit card, which contributed $669M of income in 2025, and real-estate monetization — selling closed stores and excess land — which produced $107M of proceeds in fiscal 2025, down from $283M the prior year (TipRanks earnings coverage, March 2026).

Product and business overview

Three banners, three trajectories. Macy’s (about 430 stores including small formats) is the middle-market core — apparel, beauty, home, accessories — and the shrinking part; the nameplate comped +1.6% in the quarter reported June 2026, its fourth consecutive positive quarter, after years of decline. Bloomingdale’s (roughly 57 full-line stores plus outlets and Bloomie’s small formats) is the growth story: comps +9.9% in fiscal 2025 and +10.2% in the quarter reported June 2026 — the highest first-quarter volume in the brand’s history — riding the same accessible-luxury demand that Saks Global’s chaos has left underserved. Bluemercury (172 stores) is the small but steady beauty chain, comping positive for years running (+6.4% in Q1 FY2026), now under new leader Alexandre Choueiri. Around the banners sit the marketplace (third-party sellers expanding assortment without inventory risk), Macy’s Media Network ($188M of net revenue in the year ended January 31, 2026, up from $176M the year before), and the credit-card program with Citibank. Barington and Thor’s point is that this portfolio construction is precisely the problem: Bloomingdale’s and Bluemercury would fetch higher multiples separated, and the real estate — Herald Square above all — is worth $5-9B on its own (CNBC, December 2024).

Business model and pricing

Revenue is overwhelmingly owned merchandise sell-through at promotional mid-market prices, supplemented by licensed departments and marketplace commissions. The uncomfortable structure is in the profit mix: in fiscal 2025 the company produced GAAP diluted EPS of $2.32 on $21.8B of sales, but a material share of profitability has long come from non-retail streams — credit-card income ($669M in 2025; Citi analyst Paul Lejuez estimated credit at roughly 50% of operating profit in 2023, up from 35% in 2021) and gains on asset sales, which are lumpy and finite (Q4 FY2025 asset-sale gains were just $3M versus $41M a year earlier). When card delinquencies spiked in 2023, credit revenue fell 36-41% in successive quarters and took guidance down with it — a reminder that Macy’s is partly a subprime-adjacent lender wearing a retailer’s coat. Pricing is classic high-low promotion at Macy’s (perpetual coupon culture), full-price-plus-markdown at Bloomingdale’s, and prestige-brand pricing at Bluemercury. Tariffs are a live 2026 headwind: management guided to a 3-4 cent EPS hit and 20-40 basis points of gross-margin pressure in the second quarter alone (Zacks/Yahoo Finance, June 2026).

Traction over time

Fiscal year (ends late Jan/early Feb)Net salesComparable sales (O+L+M)Notes
FY2019$24.6B~-0.7%Pre-pandemic baseline
FY2020$17.3B~-29%Pandemic collapse; Polaris plan
FY2021$24.5B+43% reboundStimulus-fueled recovery peak
FY2022$24.4Broughly flatInflation bites discretionary
FY2023$23.09BnegativeArkhouse bid lands in December
FY2024$22.29B-0.9%Bold New Chapter year one; -3.5% net sales
FY2025$21.8B+1.5%First positive annual comp since FY2021; EPS $2.32
Q1 FY2026~$4.6B+3.0%Best Q1 comp in four years; guidance raised

Sources: company releases 2020-2026; fiscal 2024 and 2025 results March 2025 and March 18, 2026; Q1 FY2026 June 3, 2026. The shape is deliberate shrinkage: roughly $3B of revenue surrendered since fiscal 2021, mostly closed stores, in exchange for a smaller base that finally comps positive. Bloomingdale’s (+10.2%) and Bluemercury (+6.4%) are pulling the average up; the FY2026 guide of $21.5-21.75B in net sales and +0.5% to +1.2% comps (raised in June 2026) still implies a company whose top line is, at best, flat.

Market analysis

The US department store industry generates roughly $70B in annual revenue across about 4,500-4,700 stores, down from 7,885 stores in 2015, and IBISWorld projects continued decline over the next five years (IBISWorld, 2026). The format’s retail value has fallen roughly 44% since 2010. The structural forces are unforgiving: off-price and Amazon captured the value and convenience ends of the market; brands went direct-to-consumer, hollowing out the department store’s role as gatekeeper; and the mall itself is contracting — about 1,200 US malls operating as of April 2025, with forecasts of roughly 900 by 2028. Macy’s is the largest player in a segment where being the largest is a diminishing prize. The genuine growth pockets are exactly where Spring is steering: accessible luxury (Bloomingdale’s, benefiting from Saks Global’s post-merger dysfunction), prestige beauty (Bluemercury, in a category that has grown through every downturn), retail media, and off-mall small formats. The bear point is proportion: those pockets together are a fraction of a company that remains roughly 85% mall-economy Macy’s.

Competitive intel

Dillard’s (~273 stores) is the sharpest rebuke: it stopped growing fifteen years ago, hoarded cash, bought back stock, and delivers margins Macy’s has never approached — the run-it-for-cash model Barington implicitly wants. Nordstrom took the exit Macy’s board refused, going private with the family and El Puerto de Liverpool for about $6.25B in May 2025 and restructuring away from quarterly scrutiny; it squeezes Bloomingdale’s from above and Macy’s via Rack from below. TJX and the off-price complex (Ross, Burlington) sell overlapping brands 20-60% cheaper, have taken share for fifteen straight years, and TJX alone carries a market cap around twenty times Macy’s. Amazon owns the replenishment basics that used to anchor trips. Kohl’s, JCPenney, and Belk fight for the same mid-market customer in a shrinking pool. In beauty, Sephora and Ulta dwarf Bluemercury; in luxury, Saks Global (Saks + Neiman Marcus) is Bloomingdale’s main full-line rival — currently a wounded one, which is Bloomingdale’s near-term gift. Macy’s advantages are real but narrow: unmatched national brand relationships at its price tier, Herald Square and the Thanksgiving parade as cultural assets, and the only three-banner spread from mid-market to luxury to prestige beauty in American retail.

History and evolution

What people say

The case for. Post-Q1 2026 sell-side commentary credits Spring with the first evidence of genuine demand recovery: four straight positive quarters at the Macy’s nameplate, a 3% consolidated comp against guidance of 0.5-1.5%, Bloomingdale’s record volume, and raised full-year guidance (Motley Fool transcript, Zacks, June 2026). Bulls note the stock’s 77% one-year run still leaves the company valued near — or below — activists’ estimate of its real estate alone, a sum-of-the-parts case where the retail operations come almost free. Value investors point to consistent earnings beats, a repaired balance sheet, and management’s demonstrated willingness to close stores rather than defend them. Fortune’s November 2025 department-store coverage grouped Macy’s with Dillard’s and Nordstrom as chains “getting their groove back” via disciplined assortments.

The complaints. The bear file is structural. Analysts have repeatedly flagged that profits lean on credit-card income (~50% of operating profit at the 2023 peak of the imbalance, per Citi’s Lejuez) and on asset-sale gains that are shrinking and unrepeatable — Q4 FY2025 gains came in at $3M versus $15-20M expected, and monetization proceeds fell to $107M from $283M (TipRanks, March 2026). Skeptics call Bold New Chapter incremental rather than transformational — mitigation of decline, not reinvention (RetailWire, 2026). Customer complaints cluster on exactly what the Reimagine program concedes: understaffed floors, messy racks, and worn stores in the non-invested majority of the fleet. Employee sentiment agrees — Macy’s carries a 3.4 Glassdoor rating across 31,000+ reviews, with recurring themes of chronic understaffing (“the store is dirty and they are so short staffed that you cannot take care of the customer”), low pay, and being pulled across roles. Governance skeptics add the $151M accounting scandal — one employee falsifying delivery-expense entries for three years without detection — and a board that rejected $24.80 in cash for a stock that spent most of the next year below $15.

Outlook: well positioned or at risk?

At-risk. The turnaround is real and still insufficient. Give Spring full credit: he chose the honest strategy — shrink the dying part, feed the growing parts — and after two years it is measurably working, with the best comps since 2021 and Bloomingdale’s compounding at double digits. But zoom out and the company is winning share of a pool that is evaporating: department store value down 44% since 2010, store counts nearly halved since 2015, a quarter of remaining malls forecast to close by 2028. Macy’s own raised FY2026 guidance still implies a flat top line, meaning every point of Bloomingdale’s growth is consumed by the melting core. Meanwhile the earnings quality problem persists — credit-card income and dwindling asset-sale gains doing work merchandise margins cannot — and tariffs are actively taxing the recovery.

The well-positioned case rests on the sum of the parts: real estate worth $5-9B by activist math, Bloomingdale’s and Bluemercury worth more separated, a market cap that until recently priced the whole company below its property. But that argument is an indictment dressed as a compliment — it says the assets are worth more away from the operating business, which is why four activist campaigns in ten years (Starboard, Jana, Arkhouse/Brigade, Barington/Thor) have all converged on the same thesis and management has refused it every time, including at $24.80 a share. A company whose most credible bull case is its own dismemberment, defending a format in secular decline with a plan that trades revenue for comp quality, is not a compounding position. Macy’s will likely keep beating lowered bars, and the stock may keep working from a depressed base; the enterprise itself remains ripe for dislocation — by activists, by acquirers, or simply by the slow arithmetic of the mall.

Sources and further reading

Capital history

DateRoundAmountValuationLead(s)
1858 Founding R.H. Macy dry goods, Manhattan First-day sales reportedly $11.06 Rowland H. Macy
1994 Federated acquires Macy's ~$4.1B merger out of Macy's Chapter 11 Creates the largest US department store company; May Company merger follows in 2005 for ~$11B Federated Department Stores
January 2016 Starboard Value campaign ~1% stake Claimed $21B of real-estate value; Starboard exited by 2017 without a spin-off Starboard Value (Jeff Smith)
October 2021 Jana Partners campaign Stake urging e-commerce spin-off Digital unit pitched at ~$8B revenue; Jana exited within months, spin-off abandoned Jana Partners
December 2023 - July 2024 Arkhouse/Brigade take-private attempt $21.00 rising to $24.80/share (~$5.8B to ~$6.9B) Board terminated talks July 15, 2024, citing financing uncertainty and insufficient value Arkhouse Management, Brigade Capital
December 9, 2024 Barington/Thor activist campaign Undisclosed stake Demands: real-estate subsidiary ($5-9B claimed value), strategic review of Bloomingdale's/Bluemercury, capex cuts, $2-3B buybacks, board seats Barington Capital, Thor Equities

Investors / owners: Institutional index and active managers (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street dominate the float), Barington Capital Group and Thor Equities (activist position disclosed December 2024)

Competitive set

  • Dillard's (NYSE: DDS) — The anti-Macy's: roughly 273 mostly Southern and Southwestern stores, essentially the same footprint as 15 years ago, family-controlled, famously stingy with capital — and rewarded with double-digit operating margins and a stock that has crushed Macy's for a decade. Proof that a department store can be run for cash rather than transformation.
  • Nordstrom (private) — Taken private in May 2025 by the Nordstrom family and Mexico's El Puerto de Liverpool in a roughly $6.25B deal — the path Macy's board refused. Now restructuring outside Wall Street's glare, it attacks Bloomingdale's from above with full-line service and Macy's from below with Nordstrom Rack.
  • TJX (NYSE: TJX) and off-price — T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, Ross, and Burlington sell the same brands 20-60% cheaper and have absorbed the department store customer for fifteen years; TJX's market cap is roughly twenty times Macy's. Macy's own Backstage off-price rooms are a defensive echo, not an answer.
  • Amazon — The default destination for the basics — apparel staples, home essentials, beauty replenishment — that once anchored department store trips, with selection, price, and delivery Macy's digital business (roughly a third of revenue) cannot match head-on.
  • Kohl's and mid-tier chains — Kohl's, JCPenney, and Belk fight Macy's for the same squeezed middle-income shopper in overlapping malls and off-mall strips; all are shrinking, making the fight zero-sum in a declining pool.
  • Sephora, Ulta, and Saks Global — Bluemercury's 172 stores compete with beauty giants Sephora (inside Kohl's) and Ulta at many times its scale, while Bloomingdale's faces Saks Global's combined Saks-Neiman Marcus luxury platform.