Construction · Deep dive
Kojo
Materials procurement and inventory software for trade contractors — takeoff to PO to delivery to invoice on one platform, now with a distributor, Wesco, as both investor and supplier.
emerging
The question that decides it: Kojo's value is a vendor-neutral layer that lets a contractor compare price and stock across Ferguson, Rexel, Mayer and Wesco and route the PO to whoever wins. Now Wesco — the largest US electrical distributor — is its biggest strategic investor and co-development partner. Can Kojo stay the neutral transaction layer between contractors and distributors when the largest distributor node both funds it and can build punchout/EDI procurement itself, or does the network tilt toward one supplier and lose the neutrality that is the whole point?
My take
- HQ
- San Francisco, CA
- Founded
- 2018
- Ownership
- VC-backed (Series C + extension; Wesco strategic, Sep 2025)
- Funding
- $94M raised (company, Oct 2025)
- Valuation
- Undisclosed
- Revenue
- Not disclosed; ARR reportedly +760% YoY (2021) and +3.5x YoY (2022); >$5B materials GMV/yr on platform (2025)
- Headcount
- ~130 (2024 est.; Contrary Research / after 2023 layoffs likely lower)
- Screen
- Raised >$100M-adjacent ($94M) — scaled private; also fast riser
- Published
- 2026-07-16
- Web
- www.usekojo.com
- Elsewhere
- LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Founders and leadership
-
Maria Davidson (née Rioumine) Co-founder & CEO
The origin of the thesis. Born in Russia, raised in Israel, moved to London at 13; read Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Oxford and was President of the Oxford Union. Investment-banking analyst at Goldman Sachs (2014-2016), then recruited by 8VC founder Joe Lonsdale to San Francisco in 2016 as his chief of staff. Watching a city full of engineers still unable to build housing or fix potholes on time became the seed for the company. She is a finance-and-strategy founder, not a builder — the domain came from six months of field interviews, not a family trade.
-
Ryan Gibson Co-founder & former CTO
The technical half. Left Microsoft to co-found the company with Davidson. Cited in early coverage as drawing on a multi-generation family history in construction — the on-the-ground credibility to complement Davidson's finance background. Built the first electrical-trade product.
-
Micah Rodman Co-founder & COO
Left Bridgewater Associates to join the founding team; runs operations. Part of the small founding group (with founding engineers Adam Williams and Michael Oliver) that launched the platform as Agora in March 2020.
Snapshot
Kojo, founded in 2018 in San Francisco and known as Agora until 2022, sells materials-procurement and inventory software to trade and self-perform contractors — the electrical, mechanical, plumbing, concrete and drywall firms that buy the physical stuff a project is made of. Materials are ~40% of construction cost and still bought on phone calls, PDFs and re-keyed spreadsheets; Kojo puts takeoff, quoting, ordering, delivery, warehouse inventory, tool tracking and invoice matching on one platform that syncs to the ERP. As of 2025 it reports 600-plus contractors across the US and Canada moving over $5 billion of materials a year, on $94 million raised from Tiger Global, Battery Ventures, 8VC and — the twist that defines its next chapter — a $10 million 2025 strategic check from Wesco, the largest US electrical distributor. It is a real mid-stage business that has also cut staff and hit the ceiling of what a low-margin industry pays for software.
Founding story
Kojo came not from the trades but from a finance operator staring at a broken city. Maria Davidson (then Rioumine) read PPE at Oxford, ran the Oxford Union, did two years as a Goldman Sachs analyst, and in 2016 was recruited to San Francisco by 8VC’s Joe Lonsdale as his chief of staff. Living amid the densest concentration of technologists on earth, she kept asking why that city still could not build housing or fix a pothole in under months. She left 8VC; Ryan Gibson left Microsoft (bringing a multi-generation construction family history); Micah Rodman left Bridgewater. Six months of field interviews produced the two numbers that set the strategy: labor is ~60% of building cost and materials ~40%, and price transparency alone could save 3-5% on materials.
They launched in March 2020 as Agora, starting deliberately in electrical — the largest US trade, $200 billion-plus in revenue, with numerous SKUs and opaque pricing. The first 100 customers landed within about eighteen months. In 2022 the company rebranded from Agora to Kojo and widened into eight trades, repositioning from an electrical tool into a horizontal procurement platform for specialty contractors.
How it works
Follow one order. A contractor does a takeoff — the list of what a job needs — and in Kojo that becomes a quote request fired at multiple vendors at once, with price and stock pulled back in real time via direct supplier and EDI integrations instead of phone tag. The field side is deliberately consumer-grade: an “Amazon-like” catalog where a foreman builds a cart and submits a material request from a phone. Requests route into a PO with approval thresholds — small orders clear automatically, large ones escalate to a PM or owner.
When goods arrive, the receiver uploads proof of delivery against the PO number, flagging shortages on the spot. The Warehouse module tracks general and job-specific stock in real time so purchasing can restock before a crew is idle; Tool Tracking does the same for tools (check-in/out, status). At the accounting end Kojo runs a three-way match — PO versus proof of delivery versus invoice — surfacing discrepancies side by side; by June 2023 its Automated Invoice Matching had processed $9.2 million and caught errors on 27% of invoices. Contractors can pay inside Kojo, and every step syncs to the ERP: Procore, Autodesk, Viewpoint Vista and Spectrum, Foundation. Supplier integrations connect Ferguson, Mayer and Rexel. In September 2023 Kojo added an AI “Intelligence Layer” — what is in stock now, what an item cost last time, how much was bought last year — and the 2025 roadmap pushes toward agents that chase distributor follow-ups and schedule releases.
Product and business overview
Kojo is sold as modules around a procure-to-pay spine: Purchasing (multi-vendor RFQs), Field (mobile catalog), Warehouse (inventory), Tool Tracking, Operations (spend analytics), Accounting (three-way match and payments), and a Vendor product that automates POs, acknowledgements, shipping notices and invoices over EDI for suppliers. It bills itself as a “one-stop shop for purchasing and inventory” connecting field, office, warehouse, accounting and — increasingly — the distributor.
The customer is a trade or self-perform general contractor across MEP, concrete, drywall, glazing, roofing and flooring. Named users range from mid-size specialists (Kleinknecht Electric, Arrow Electric, Vertical Mechanical Group) to enterprise design-build firms — Power Design Inc. (1,700-plus completed projects) adopted Kojo as its procure-to-pay platform in November 2023; the Concrete Foundations Association became a preferred-vendor channel in 2022.
Business model and pricing
Kojo is SaaS, sold as a custom subscription with unlimited users and data and a dedicated account manager; it does not publish prices. That cuts two ways. It signals an enterprise, sales-led motion — good for expansion and multi-year deals — but every contract is negotiated into an industry that spends only 1-2% of revenue on IT (versus 3-5% economy-wide) at 3-5% net margins. A competitor’s employee (Tegus, September 2022) described Kojo as perceived “up-market” — priced above what much of a cost-obsessed contractor base wants to pay. Revenue is undisclosed; the only signals are rate-of-change — ARR up a reported 760% YoY at the 2021 Series B, 3.5x YoY at the 2022 Series C — impressive multiples off a small base, consistent with a company that then had to cut costs.
Traction over time
| Date | Customers / users | Materials volume | Team | Funding to date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2020 | Launched as Agora (electrical) | — | Small founding team | Seed |
| ~2021 | First 100 customers | — | ~45 | Series A ($7M, Oct 2020) |
| Aug 2021 | ARR +760% YoY | — | Growing | $40M (Series B) |
| Sep 2022 | ARR +3.5x YoY | >$1B orders processed | ~90 (doubled YoY) | $83.6M (Series C) |
| Nov 2023 | 25K projects, 15K+ pros, 47 states | $30M+ saved for customers | — | $83.6M |
| Mar 2024 | — | ~$2B/yr materials orders | ~129 | $83.6M |
| 2025 | 600+ contractors (US + Canada) | >$5B materials/yr | — | $94M (Wesco extension) |
A genuine scale-up, but not a straight line. From launch in 2020 to $1B of materials processed and 90 people by the 2022 Series C, to $2B/year and 25,000 projects by 2024, to $5B/year and 600-plus contractors by 2025, throughput has grown fast. The gap between platform GMV ($5B) and Kojo’s own revenue (undisclosed) is the whole diligence question — and the stretch between the 2022 Series C and the 2025 extension included layoffs and three years without a priced up-round, closed instead by a distributor’s strategic check.
Market analysis
The numerator is enormous, the denominator stingy. Roughly $9.7 trillion was spent on construction globally in 2022 (Construction Briefing), materials ~40% of that — ~$4 trillion of materials a year that Kojo sits next to. The software slice is smaller and estimates vary: construction-tech ~$5 billion in 2023 growing to ~$24.2 billion by 2033 at 16.9% CAGR (Future Market Insights); a narrower construction-software figure runs to ~$7.5 billion by 2032 (Market Research Future). The tailwind is labor: the ABC estimated a 501,000-worker shortfall entering 2024, with 40%+ of the workforce set to retire within a decade. The headwind is the customer’s wallet — low margins and the lowest IT-spend ratio of any major industry — the perennial “huge TAM, hard to monetize” construction-tech epitaph.
Competitive intel
The field splits three ways. Direct rivals are smaller and lighter: StructShare (2017, $8M seed) matches Kojo on trades and AI and beat it to a Procore integration but lacks its warehouse/tool-tracking depth; Field Materials (2022, $4.7M seed) is narrower still. Kojo is the best-funded and most complete of this cohort. The bundlers are the real gravity: Procore ($11.5B market cap, March 2024) owns the GC relationship and can extend into invoicing — though it chose to cross-sell Kojo rather than build against it — while horizontal suites (Coupa, GEP, SAP Ariba) are the corporate-procurement default for the largest contractors despite not being construction-native. The distributors are the wildcard: Wesco, Ferguson and Rexel already run punchout, EDI, vending and VMI and could route contractors onto their own rails. Kojo’s edge is neutrality plus depth — the only one comparing price and stock across distributors and running the order to a three-way match. Its exposure: the depth is a product lead, not a moat, and the neutrality is now complicated by who is on the cap table.
History and evolution
- 2018 — Founded in San Francisco as Agora Systems by Maria Davidson (née Rioumine) and Ryan Gibson, with Micah Rodman and founding engineers.
- Oct 2020 — $7M Series A led by 8VC (Tishman Speyer, Suffolk, Abstract, BoxGroup); product had launched as Agora in March 2020, starting in electrical.
- Aug 2021 — $33M Series B led by Tiger Global; company reports 760% YoY ARR growth.
- May-Sep 2022 — Rebrands from Agora to Kojo and expands from electrical into eight trades; $39M Series C led by Battery Ventures (Schneider/SE Ventures, RXR, Bienville, Human Capital, Suffolk, 8VC); ~90 employees, $1B+ materials processed; named SaaS Awards’ best construction SaaS product.
- 2022-2023 — Layoffs. Glassdoor reviews describe staff told cuts were not coming, then cut ~two months later, with heavy attrition beneath the ~129-person 2024 headline.
- Jun-Sep 2023 — Expands into mechanical; Automated Invoice Matching hits $9.2M processed (27% error catch rate); launches the AI “Kojo Intelligence Layer.”
- Nov 2023 — 25K projects, 15K+ professionals, 47 states; Power Design Inc. adopts Kojo as its procure-to-pay platform.
- Sep-Oct 2025 — Wesco invests $10M (its largest-ever tech investment) in a Series C extension, taking the round to ~$49M and total funding to $94M; the two co-develop tools, first shipping “Project POs” for long-lead-time orders including data-center construction. Kojo reports 600+ contractors and $5B+ materials/year.
What people say
The case for. Customers on G2, Capterra and Software Advice (2026) call Kojo a game-changer that collapses procurement busywork — faster ordering, real-time spend visibility, fewer re-keyed invoices — and praise a clean interface for a construction tool. The product is unusually complete (procurement plus real inventory, warehouse and tool tracking, plus a genuine three-way match), and the invoice-matching stat (errors caught on 27% of invoices) is the hard-dollar proof contractors respond to. Enterprise wins (Power Design) and Procore cross-selling rather than competing are third-party validation. Glassdoor sentiment is net positive on paper — ~4.1 of 5, ~86% recommending — with praise for a strong remote culture and a bright C-suite.
The complaints. The same Glassdoor page holds the honest negatives. Multiple reviews describe layoffs that followed explicit reassurances there would be none, high attrition (“the odds of making it past 18 months are slim”), thin career progression, pointed titles (“Kojo is Failing”), and a specific allegation that some account executives treated female colleagues poorly. On product, the recurring theme is price and adoption friction — a learning curve on advanced features and Kojo being perceived as up-market in an industry that buys software the way it buys commodities. And the two facts absent from the deck: three years between the 2022 Series C and a 2025 round that was a distributor’s extension rather than a priced institutional up-round, and no disclosed revenue or retention to judge whether $5B of GMV converts into a venture-scale software business.
Outlook: the open question
Kojo becomes a category if it stays the neutral, must-use transaction layer between contractors and every distributor — winning because it compares price and stock across Ferguson, Rexel, Mayer and Wesco and runs the order end to end; it becomes a feature if the network tilts toward one supplier, or if distributors and Procore make “good enough” procurement native to the rails contractors already use. The product is real and unusually complete, the wedge (materials are 40% of cost, bought on paper) is genuine, and 600 contractors moving $5B a year is not vaporware. But the defining tension is now on the cap table. Wesco’s $10M is validation, distribution — and a channel conflict. Kojo’s promise is neutrality: a contractor trusts it because it is not a distributor and routes the PO to whoever wins on price and lead time. The moment the largest electrical distributor is also the largest strategic investor and co-development partner, every rival distributor and contractor has to ask whether the recommendations point to the best price or to Wesco. The bull case holds if Kojo keeps signing multi-distributor integrations and its non-Wesco GMV keeps growing, if the Wesco partnership ships genuinely neutral tooling without preferencing Wesco stock, and if pricing power shows up as net-dollar retention above ~120%. The bear case wins if order flow visibly concentrates toward Wesco, if Ferguson- and Rexel-side contractors defect, or if distributors’ own punchout/EDI plus Procore’s bundle make a standalone neutral layer redundant. Three years without a priced up-round says the market has not decided; the next round, and who leads it, will.
How a challenger would attack it
The wedge is neutrality — the thing Kojo just sold. A challenger would position as the Switzerland Kojo can no longer be: “we take no distributor money, our price comparison points wherever the best price is.” Every Ferguson- and Rexel-loyal contractor now has a reason to listen, and every rival distributor has a reason to integrate with the challenger first. Second vector: price. Kojo is custom-priced, sales-led, and perceived as up-market in an industry that spends 1-2% of revenue on IT at 3-5% net margins — Field Materials and StructShare already compete on being lighter and cheaper, so a challenger would publish transparent per-seat or per-GMV pricing and self-serve onboarding, converting the mid-market Kojo’s account-manager motion can’t profitably touch. Third: AI-native procurement. Kojo bolted an “Intelligence Layer” onto a 2020-era workflow product; a challenger builds agents that do the RFQ blast, chase distributor follow-ups, and reconcile invoices from day one, undercutting the module-by-module upsell. Kojo’s depth (warehouse, tool tracking, three-way match) is a product lead, not a moat — the file says so itself — and three years without a priced up-round plus layoff-scarred Glassdoor reviews mean the challenger can also out-recruit it.
Same playbook, new buyer
The most promising shift is trade-vertical and down-market: framing, which Kojo did not serve as of 2024, plus the long tail of sub-$50M contractors priced out of a negotiated enterprise contract — same procure-to-pay spine, sold at commodity prices with self-serve setup. Kojo won’t follow easily because its unit economics are built around dedicated account managers and custom contracts; chasing small contractors would cannibalize its enterprise positioning while its post-layoff team is stretched. The second shift is geographic: Kojo covers only the US and Canada, but the materials problem — 40% of cost, bought on phone calls and PDFs — is global against ~$4 trillion of annual materials spend. A European or Gulf-market clone faces different distributors, VAT and ERP stacks Kojo has no integrations for. Third, flip the customer: Kojo’s Vendor product hints at it, but a supplier-side platform sold to regional distributors as their answer to Wesco-Kojo — arming the mid-tier distributors the Wesco deal just alienated — turns Kojo’s channel conflict into the pitch.
Sources and further reading
- Report: Kojo Business Breakdown & Founding Story (Contrary Research, March 2024)
- Construction tech startup Kojo rebrands, expands and lands $39M in Series C funding (TechCrunch, September 2022)
- Construction tech startup Agora raises $33M in Tiger Global-led round amid 760% YoY ARR growth (TechCrunch, August 2021)
- Wesco Invests $10M in Materials Procurement Provider Kojo (Modern Distribution Management, September 2025)
- Wesco invests in Kojo to build AI procurement tools for construction (Digital Commerce 360, September 2025)
- Kojo Poised to Revolutionize Construction Materials Management (Business Wire, October 2025)
- Maria Davidson Builds Kojo To Make Construction More Efficient (Forbes, October 2023)
- Kojo Adds Power Design Inc. as Key New Enterprise Partner (PR Newswire, November 2023)
- Kojo Technologies Reviews (Glassdoor, accessed 2026)
- Kojo Software Pricing, Alternatives & More (Capterra, accessed 2026)
Capital history
| Date | Round | Amount | Valuation | Lead(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Seed | ~$4.6M (implied) | Undisclosed | Early backers incl. 8VC; exact terms not disclosed |
| Oct 2020 | Series A | $7M | Undisclosed | 8VC, with Tishman Speyer, Suffolk Construction, Abstract Ventures, Kevin Hartz, BoxGroup |
| Aug 2021 | Series B | $33M | Undisclosed | Tiger Global (reported 760% YoY ARR growth), with 8VC and others |
| Sep 2022 | Series C | $39M | Undisclosed | Battery Ventures, with Schneider Electric / SE Ventures, RXR, Bienville Capital, Human Capital, Suffolk, AME Cloud Ventures, 8VC, BoxGroup |
| Sep 2025 | Series C extension (Series C-II) | $10M (extension now ~$49M; total raised $94M) | Undisclosed | Wesco International (strategic; largest tech investment in Wesco's history), extending the Battery-led round |
Investors / owners: Battery Ventures, Tiger Global, 8VC, Wesco International, Schneider Electric / SE Ventures, RXR, Suffolk Construction, Human Capital, Bienville Capital, BoxGroup, Tishman Speyer, Abstract Ventures
Competitive set
- Procore — Public construction-management gorilla (NYSE: PCOR; ~$11.5B market cap, March 2024). Primarily project management, but its invoice-management and financials modules overlap Kojo's accounting tools. Unusually, it is both rival and partner: Kojo is the only materials-management platform Procore has a formal cross-sell agreement with, so Procore AEs can sell Kojo. The threat is bundling — if 'good enough' procurement lands inside the system GCs already run, a standalone loses seats.
- StructShare — The closest direct comp. Founded 2017; raised an $8M seed led by KOMPAS (March 2023). Same trade coverage (MEP, concrete, drywall, roofing, flooring) plus framing, which Kojo did not serve as of 2024, and it added a GenAI layer in Oct 2023. Beat Kojo to a Procore integration in 2021. Weaker on inventory: no true warehouse or tool-tracking equivalent. Competes on being lighter and cheaper.
- Field Materials — Younger, narrower rival. Founded 2022; $4.7M seed led by Blumberg Capital (April 2023). Covers quotes, orders and invoices — Kojo's purchasing, field and accounting slices — but lacks inventory/warehouse and deep budget tracking. The bottom-of-market, price-led attacker.
- Wesco / Ferguson / Rexel (distributor eProcurement) — The structural competitor hiding as a partner. Distributors already run punchout catalogs, EDI/cXML, VMI and vending. Wesco alone offers punchout, electronic invoicing, point-of-use material management and catalog exchange (Ariba, SAP, Oracle). They can push their own procurement rails direct to contractors and disintermediate a neutral layer — which is exactly why Wesco investing in, rather than building against, Kojo is the whole story.
- GEP / Coupa / SAP Ariba — Horizontal procurement/source-to-pay suites. Not construction-native (no takeoff, cost codes, jobsite delivery, three-way match against a PO). They rarely win a specialty contractor head-to-head, but for larger self-perform GCs with a corporate procurement function they are the 'we already have a system' default Kojo must displace.
- ServiceTitan / BuildOps / Trunk Tools — Adjacent trade-software players expanding toward the same contractor wallet. ServiceTitan (public) and BuildOps own field service and project ops for the trades; Trunk Tools and similar AI-for-construction startups attack workflow and documents. None is a materials-procurement product today, but each sits close enough to bundle procurement later.